I wonder, Can we do Direct attack when opponent have 1 face-up earthbound immortal on the field?,,
Earthbounds reminds me for legendary Fisherman
Legendary Fisherman eff and Rulings
eff:
As long as "Umi" is face-up on the field, this card is unaffected by any Spell Cards. Monsters on your opponent's side of the field cannot select this card as an attack target.
ruling:
"If a face-up "The Legendary Fisherman" is the only monster you control, when your opponent's monsters attack, they attack you directly.[1]"
earthbound eff and ruling
ccapac apu eff:
"There can only be 1 face-up "Earthbound Immortal" monster on the Field. If there is no face-up Field Spell Card on the Field, destroy this card. Your opponent cannot select this card as an attack target. This card can attack your opponent Directly. If this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monster's ATK."
ruling
"If you control an Earthbound Immortal and no other monsters, your opponent cannot attack you, because they cannot select the Earthbound Immortal as an attack target. (Exception: they can attack with monsters that can attack directly, such as “Submarineroid.”)"
I get the ruling both from netrep and their Bolded eff looks like the same but why they ruling looks completely different??
that makes no sense for me -.-
Earthbounds reminds me for legendary Fisherman
Legendary Fisherman eff and Rulings
eff:
As long as "Umi" is face-up on the field, this card is unaffected by any Spell Cards. Monsters on your opponent's side of the field cannot select this card as an attack target.
ruling:
"If a face-up "The Legendary Fisherman" is the only monster you control, when your opponent's monsters attack, they attack you directly.[1]"
earthbound eff and ruling
ccapac apu eff:
"There can only be 1 face-up "Earthbound Immortal" monster on the Field. If there is no face-up Field Spell Card on the Field, destroy this card. Your opponent cannot select this card as an attack target. This card can attack your opponent Directly. If this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monster's ATK."
ruling
"If you control an Earthbound Immortal and no other monsters, your opponent cannot attack you, because they cannot select the Earthbound Immortal as an attack target. (Exception: they can attack with monsters that can attack directly, such as “Submarineroid.”)"
I get the ruling both from netrep and their Bolded eff looks like the same but why they ruling looks completely different??
that makes no sense for me -.-